Comparison of therapy
approaches for young children who stutter.
|
Indirect Therapy |
Direct Therapy |
Lidcombe Program |
|
Works
on changes the environment to support fluency. . |
Direct
work with the child who learns to speak in a way that is incompatible with stuttering. |
Spontaneous
stutter free speech is “rewarded” and child
is helped to change unambiguous stuttering |
|
Ex. Fluency Generating Play Periods, planning a
less hectic schedule, turn taking, parent speech models |
Ex.
“Easy Speech” “Turtle
Talk” Language
hierarchy is a key component. |
Stutter
Free Speech, moves from structured to unstructured including time of day,
degree of adult direction of language difficulty. |
|
Both
clinician and parent conduct sessions.
|
Clinician
does therapy, parent may do homework |
Parent
does therapy, clinician coaches parent and tracks progress |
|
Evaluate
from time to time. |
Evaluate
from time to time. |
Daily
documentation is essential to the program |
|
Fun
for parent and child. |
Should
be fun for child. |
Fun
for parent and child. |
|
Time
honored for preschool age child |
Often
done with preschool age child. Usually
the treatment of choice for younger school age children. |
Designed
for children 6 and younger. May be done with older ages but may not be
sufficient. Evidence based. Newer in US. Routine in Australia and Canada |
|
Is
it helpful? Absolutely yes. If it is
not helpful in a reasonable period of time, move to another approach. |
Is
it helpful? Yes. |
Is
it helpful? The research says “yes” as
does my experience. |
|
Worries: Is it enough? |
Worries: Some children dislike the artificial speech
pattern. They may dislike the structure. Kids would rather be with their parents. |
Worry: Will we convey to a child that stuttering
is not okay. What if this is a child
who will stutter for the lifetime? |
Connie Dugan